If you received this post via email, click here to get to the web version--especially if pictures don't show up in your email, because you'll basically miss the whole point of this post.
Isa Chandra Moskowitz: Veganomicon: The Ultimate Vegan Cookbook
Joel Fuhrman: Eat For Health: Lose Weight, Keep It Off, Look Younger, Live Longer (2 book set)
Vincent Fortanasce: The Anti-Alzheimer's Prescription: The Science-Proven Plan to Start at Any Age
Sylvia Phd Boorstein: Happiness Is an Inside Job: Practicing for a Joyful Life
Michael Pollan: The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
Jeanne Lemlin: Vegetarian Classics: 300 Essential Recipes for Every Course and Every Meal
Holly L Thacker: Womens Health: Your Body, Your Hormones, Your Choices (Cleveland Clinic Guides)
Sonja Lyubomirsky: The How of Happiness: A Scientific Approach to Getting the Life You Want
If you received this post via email, click here to get to the web version--especially if pictures don't show up in your email, because you'll basically miss the whole point of this post.
Posted on September 25, 2012 at 06:11 AM | Permalink | Comments (4)
|
|
|
Genetically Modified Crops include Bt (Bacillius thuringiensis) Cotton & Corn, and Herbicide-Tolerant (HT) Soy, Cotton, and Corn. Almost All Soybeans Grown in the United States are Now Genetically Modified.
Data from USDA Reports (Mother Earth News Apr/May 2012)
If you received this post via email, click here, to get to the web version with all the links, & to watch "Genetic Roulette"
GMOs in the Grocery Store? What Does It Mean, Exactly?
A little back-story, to get you started.
“Genetic modification” refers to the manipulation of DNA by humans to change the essential makeup of plants and animals. The technology inserts genetic material from one species into another to give a crop or animal a new quality, such as the ability to produce a pesticide.
These DNA transfers could never occur in nature and are not as precise as proponents make them sound.
Some genetically modified crops have been engineered to include genetic material from BT (Bacillus thuringiensis), a natural bacterium found in soil.
Inserting the Bt genes makes the plant itself produce bacterial toxins, thereby killing the insects that could destroy it. The first GM crop carrying Bt genes, potatoes, were approved in the United States in 1995. Today there are Bt versions of corn, potatoes and cotton.
Roundup-Ready crops — soybeans, corn, canola, sugar beets, cotton, alfalfa and Kentucky bluegrass — have been manipulated to be resistant to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s broadleaf weedkiller Roundup.
These two GM traits — herbicide resistance and pesticide production — are now pervasive in American agriculture.
The Department of Agriculture’s National Agricultural Statistics Service says that, in 2010, as much as 86 percent of corn, up to 90 percent of all soybeans and nearly 93 percent of cotton were GM varieties.
You’re eating genetically modified foods almost daily unless you grow all of your food or always buy organic."
-Robin Mather, "The Threats from Genetically Modified Food," Mother Earth News, April/May 2012-
The pros & cons of GMO food are more than I could begin to tackle in a single blog post.
To get a handle on the concerns with the pervasiveness of GMOs in our food supply--YOU, dear reader, should you choose to accept this assignment--will have do some homework. But, no worries. All the assignments are listed below.
Frankly, the whole GMO issue is something I haven't paid all that much attention to.
That's is--until recently.
The published research into the potential adverse health effects of GMO-foods is on the scant-side, because companies like Monsanto don't have to give out their seeds to be tested. Corporate patent laws protect them from scrutiny.
But, reports from respected physicians, veterinarians, botanists, agriculture researchers, policy makers, government scientists, and farmers present a whole laundry list of worrisome side effects:
So, how is it possible that there is so little published research on the long-term effects of GMOs on human & animal health, considering that GMO-seeds now totally dominate the farming industry?
Turns out, the FDA allowed Monsanta to conduct its own research prior to approval of GMO seeds in the 1990's. That's right! No independent investigators. Monsanto did their own research in-house. And none of the studies were long-term, which would be necessary to show any connection to cancer, birth defects, or reproductive disorders. In fact, there was only one human feeding study conducted, prior to approval of Round-Up ready soy seeds.
The FDA policy commissioner at the time of GMO approval was Michael R. Taylor, who had previous ties to Monsanto as their legal counsel--and has had a revolving door of positions between Monsanto, King & Spalding, a law firm representing Monsanto, & the FDA. Right now, he's the FDA's "Food Safety Czar".
"As the system now stands, biotech companies bring their own research to the government body overseeing their proposed products. The agency may be the US Dept. of Agriculture, the federal Food and Drug Administration or the Environmental Protection Agency.
These government bodies do no independent studies on the safety and efficacy of the proposed products. Instead, they rely strictly on the research conducted by the companies.
"We don’t have the whole picture. That’s no accident. Multibillion-dollar agricultural corporations, including Monsanto and Syngenta, have restricted independent research on their genetically-engineered crops,” wrote Doug Gurion-Sherman of the Union of Concerned Scientists in a February 2011 Los Angeles Times op-ed piece.
“They have often refused to provide independent scientists with seeds, or they’ve set restrictive conditions that severely limit research options.”
Honestly, the whole corporations-versus-consumer-versus-the-FDA-&-the-USDA controversy is so shrouded with secrecy & accusations that it's hard to get a bottom line on the real risks of GMOs to our health & our environment.
My bottom line: I'm not a GMO fan. I'm concerned. I'm going to make every effort to avoid the stuff. Why wait until it's too late?
Why Not Watch Jeffrey M. Smith's Documentary, "Genetic Roulette: The Gamble of Our Lives" and Decide About GMO's for Yourself?
Do Not Miss This One!!! It's a worthwhile investment of 1 hr and 24 mins. And besides, it's free online from Sept. 15-22nd only. So don't put this off for too long.
You'll find the link to this disturbing documentary, here. Sorry, I couldn't insert it into the post.
The Lab Rat & I watched "Genetic Roulette" last night. It's a new documentary that "reveals the serious health impacts of genetically engineered foods in our diets." No coincidence that its release is timed to the upcoming California Proposition 37 to label GMOs in food.
Which foods are GMO--unless otherwise labeled?
Soy (I only buy non-GMO)
Corn (not popcorn)
Cottonseed (for oil)
Canola (for oil)
Sugar beets (for sugar)
Papaya
Zucchini
Yellow crookneck squash
Alfalfa (for hay)
Aspartame
All of the foods listed above (or their derivatives, like corn syrup, etc), are genetically modified (GMO) if they were grown in the US & are not labeled organic or non-GMO.
Organic foods are all non-GMO.
"Prop 37 isn’t a ban on foods containing genetically engineered material; it’s a right-to-know law.
Big Food is worried that this is the thin edge of the wedge, and I (Bittman) hope they’re right. If we win the right to know what’s in processed food, we might be inclined to demand to know how other food is produced. (You might think of Prop 37 as the anti-ag-gag law.) If genetically engineered food is so terrific, persuade us; if it’s not, well, fine. In any case, it should be up to us to buy it or not, but first we have to know what it is.
I (Bittman) want to know — quite technically, in all the detail available — how my food is produced, and I’m far from alone. We’d be able to make saner choices, and those choices would greatly affect Big Food’s ability to freely use genetically manipulated materials, an almost unlimited assortment of drugs and inhumane and environmentally destructive animal-production methods."
The Murky Money Story Behind the Funding for the Stanford Organic Food Study
This one's a real EYE-OPENER!! If you haven't read it already, be sure to read Linda Watson's piece, "Stanford Organic Study: Should You Take It with a Grain of Salt (Slide Show) in the September 12, 2012 Huffington Post.
Just follow the corporate money trail on the recent Archives of Internal Medicine Stanford study that found "no huge benefits" to eating organic produce. How naive of me!!
I believed the article's disclaimer: "The authors received no external funding for this study." But, who funds Stanford's Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, & who funded the researchers' study?
"A simple look at FSI's 2011 annual report shows that it is funded by Cargill and others who have a strong financial interest in Monsanto, McDonalds, Walmart, and other businesses that profit from industrial food practices.
Before you head out to the market, check out this slide show (in Watson's Huff Post article) to see how the Stanford Institute that funded the study gets its money and to see some of the other reasons to choose organic when you can. Tell us which ones you would take with a grain of salt."
Check out: "Uneasy Allies in the Grocery Aisle," by Stephanie Strom, September 13, 2012, New York Times. Get a better handle on the key players fighting the GMO-Labeling California ballot issue, Proposition 37.
The whole "organic food" & pro-non-GMO story gets even more complicated. Look who's funding the huge anti-GMO labeling campaign to defeat proposition 37 in California? Along with Monsanto & DuPont are a whole lot of organic food companies who are now owned by big corporations.
The Corporate Seed Connection
What Do You Think?
Are GMOs Something to Be Concerned About
OR
Are Consumer Fears Based on Anectdotal Evidence & Shaky Science?
Posted on September 18, 2012 at 03:04 PM | Permalink | Comments (12)
|
|
|
If you received this post via email, click here, to get to the website & view the trailer, the links, & leave a comment.
On Thursday, my husband forwarded this to me at work.
The message: What were you thinking when you added this to our Netflix queue? Another loser movie?
Me: Not me. You must have added it! You probably heard about it from one of your gardening magazines or when you were doing research for your insect presentation. Why would I order a movie about bees?
Lab Rat: Definitely not me! You added it.
Turns out--it was me. As I wrote this post, I realized I added it months ago from a recommendation by Frederic & Mary Brussat.
Saturday Afternoon - Sitting in Our Lush Sunny Backyard
We grabbed books, the newspaper, and sank into lounge chairs to enjoy the sun and the quiet of the late afternoon. Son #2 enjoyed a Green Smoothie along with Chex Mix--a old-time favorite comfort snack of his.
It was peaceful, relaxing, delightful. But, not completely silent.
Lab Rat: What's that noise? Do you hear it?
Me: Yeah. What's that noise? It's so loud.
Lab Rat: Bees. Honey Bees. Don't worry, they won't bother you a bit. They're just busy at work.
Sunday Evening: We Watched the Queen of the Sun
Beekeeper and healer Sara Mapelli performs with 12,000 bees in a scene from Queen of the Sun
"Queen of Sun explores the varied reasons for colony collapse while providing a road map for combating it: the eradication of monoculture farming, abandoning the use of pesticides that end up harming bees more than the pests they're meant to eradicate, and stopping migratory beekeeping that truck bees all over the country, killing millions in transit and stressing the colonies."
-Ian Buckwalter, "'Sun' Days: A Time of Hanging On and Hoping," NPR, June 9, 2011-
The honey bees had us completely under their spell for 1 1/2 hours!
I still had no idea which of us had added The Queen of the Sun to our Netflix queue--but, what a winner this documentary was.
Beauty, science, nature, spirituality, gentle caretaking, man's misguided interference and a serious warning to the world. An ancient insect is now in peril.
If you're a gardener. If you love flowers. If you love fruit. If you're intrigued by the intricate symbiotic nature of nature. If you have concerns about pesticides--add Alzheimer's for bees to your worry list. If you want to know how genetically-modified (GMO) seeds are made--and what their impact might be on our environment & future food production--this will be an eye-opener. If you had no idea how miles and miles of fields planted only with one crop--like, corn and soybeans--can harm bees--you'll find out. If you had no idea that bee hives are now trucked thousands of miles in order to pollinate crops--and even bees are being fed high-fructose corn syrup. Or that there's such a thing as artificial insemination for Queen Bees--and there's a price to pay for messing with Queen's sex life!
You'll want to watch this movie.
But, is it boring and dry? Another gloom and movie, that should have been called, "Bee-pocalypse"?
Not at all! Gorgeous flowers. Some zany characters. Fascinating beekeepers & scenery from Italy, France, New Zealand, Oregon, and even the Bronx. An entomologist. A physicist. Biologists. And your eyes will be opened.
The honey bees are our canaries in the coal mine!
And they're telling us something.
If You Don't See the Trailer on Your Screen Click Here
"QUEEN OF THE SUN: What Are the Bees Telling Us? is a profound, alternative look at the global bee crisis from the award-winning director of THE REAL DIRT ON FARMER JOHN.
Taking us on a journey through the catastrophic disappearance of bees and the mysterious world of the beehive, this alarming and ultimately uplifting film weaves together a dramatic story of the heart-felt struggles of beekeepers, scientists and philosophers around the world.
This spellbinding film explores the long-term causes that have led to one of our most urgent global food crises, illuminating the deep link between humans and bees.
The story unveils 10,000 years of beekeeping, highlighting how that historic and sacred relationship has been lost. Inspiring and entertaining, QUEEN OF THE SUN uncovers the problems and solutions in renewing a culture in balance with nature."
-The Queen of the Sun website-
Go to the documentary's website, to learn more!
Don't Just Take My Word About How Good This Movie Is
“A remarkable documentary that's also one of the most beautiful nature films I've seen.”
- Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times
“Revelatory! Honey has never looked so delicious. Or so precious.”
Jeannette Catsoulis, New York Times - Critic’s Pick
"Visually sumptuous...lovingly shot, near-psychedelic imagery, which serves as an unusually visceral reminder of the rich variety in nature—and what’s at stake if bees bug out for good, Village Voice
“An inspiring documentary, one of the best films of 2011.” Frederic and Mary Ann Brussat, Spirituality and Practice
“A creative exploration of the global honeybee crisis replete with remarkable nature cinematography, some eccentric characters and yet another powerful argument for organic, sustainable agriculture in balance with nature.” -Alissa Simon, Variety
"Bee Movie is no B Movie. Whether or not you like honey on your morning muffin, you ought to be concerned with the health of the nation's bees." -Walter Addiego, San Francisco Chronicle
“Colony Collapse Disorder should be a planetary wake up call akin to Rachel Carson’s 1960s pesticide expose Silent Spring.” David Lamble, Bay Area Reporter
“Beautifully blends poetry and science to tell the story of what may be the most important co-evolutionary bond on Earth… Queen of the Sun's optimistic tone suggests solutions will flower from the seeds of new perspectives.” - Rick Marianetti, The Examiner
“I never thought that a documentary about honeybees would make me both laugh and cry-but filmmaker Taggart Siegel’s Queen of the Sun is one such film.” -Dennis Hartley, Hullabaloo
You can watch the movie here, for $4.99.
Or buy the video.
Or order it from Netflix, like we did.
Or borrow it from your library.
I hope you enjoy it as much as we did!
I'm trying to convince the Lab Rat to become a beekeeper. He's thinking about it.
Posted on May 28, 2012 at 06:45 AM | Permalink | Comments (5)
|
|
|
If you do not see the Temper Tantrum video on your screen, click here.
"The trick is to get the child past the peaks of anger. Once you do that, what's left is the sadness, and sad children reach out for comfort.
The quickest way past the anger--is to do nothing.
Don't shout, don't hit, don't try to comfort the child. But, when a child is screaming it's hard to do nothing.
[W}hen children are at the peak of anger and they're screaming and they're kicking, probably asking questions might prolong that period of anger.
When I'm advising people about anger I say, 'There's an anger trap. Even asking questions can prolong the anger--and the tantrum.'
It's difficult for them to process information--they're overwhelmed. And to respond to a question that the parent is asking them may be just adding more information into the system than they can really cope with.
It's better to keep things simple. Issue short commands like, sit down, go to your room.
Understanding that tantrums have a rhythm can not only help parents know when to intervene, but also give them a sense of control."
-Psychologists Michael Potegal & James Green, "Screaming, yelling, whining, and crying: categorical and intensity differences in vocal expressions of anger and sadness in children's tantrums," Emotion 2011 Oct;11(5):1124-33-
If you received this post via email, click here to get to the web version with the links & the temper tantrum video!
Anyone Can Have a Temper Tantrum
OK--so, you don't have kids, or your kids are all grown. You have zero interest in tantrums. Why read this post?
Because---the advice you'll find here can apply to your boss, your spouse, or your friends. Anyone who's overwrought, frustrated, tired, hungry, angry and needs to vent! Sure, with adults there's no kicking or screaming--but sometimes it's not a far stretch to substitute the word "venting"--for a "tantrum".
Toddler Tantrums Deconstructed
Would I be so ga-ga about research on tantrums if I weren't a grandparent--and dealt with a few toddler melt-downs myself? Probably not!
But, you don't have to be a parent or a grandparent to experience the "horror show" of a full-blown temper tantrum. Think grocery store lines, airplanes, or restaurants.
It's happened to all of us--and it can make us feel as helpless as the screaming & kicking child who's having the tantrum. And by the way--all kids have tantrums.
"Small kids just have tantrums. Some have lots of them. Tantrums may be traumatic for parents, but they're mostly normal behavior. So science hasn't paid much attention to them--until now." (NPR)
But, if psychologists Potegal & Green are right--and I sure hope they are--there's both parental power & a sense of control when you know that all tantrums follow the same pattern--and if you know exactly when to ignore them, and when to intervene--a tanturm becomes easier to endure.
"[W]hen looked at scientifically, tantrums are no different than thunderstorms or other natural phenomena. Studying them as scientific subjects, rather than experiencing them like parents can cause the tantrums to stop feeling traumatic and even become interesting." (NPR) Really????
My Temper Tantrum "Ah Ha" Moment!
When I heard the NPR story yesterday morning I had an AH HA moment!
Isn't a toddler's temper tantrum something we can all relate to?
When we're REALLY REALLY UPSET or REALLY REALLY ANGRY (of course, I never am) we just want to have our say--and have someone listen to it--and not interrupt us.
BTW--it only took me about 30 years of marriage to learn to just close my mouth & listen when my husband was having the equivalent of a grown-up's temper tantrum. Plenty of time to talk & comfort after he's had a chance to vent!
Thanks to Michael Potegal of the University of Minnesota, & James Green of the University of Connecticut, who studied & recorded over one hundred temper tantrums--there just may be an easy technique for dealing with the terrible two's & meltdowns.
How crazy is this? Potegal & Green devised a onesie with a wireless microphone. Then they convinced parents to put the onesie on their kids--& hit the GO button, so they could record all that tantrum screaming, crying, wailing, & whining.
Potegal & Green say most temper tantrums follow the same pattern--the build up is quite quick--to a peak of anger--but then the child exhausts himself & what's left is a child who wants to be comforted.
The Play-By-Play Analysis of a Tantrum
NPR: (commenting on the video) It looks like the tantrum is escalating. But, in fact, what the new theory suggests is exactly the opposite.
Green: (speaking about the child in the video) Once she's thrown herself on the floor and thrown something, or in this case, knocked the chair against the wall, we're probably on the down slope of this tantrum. She's spent a lot of energy; screaming, yelling and now doing these physical behaviors.
NPR: The scream was a peak. No one can stay that angry for long - it's exhausting. I asked Green what sounds he expected next from Katrina (the child in the video).
Green: Probably something...like crying or whining. There's been so much energy expended. The child knows that they've been out of control. That leads to a sense that they'd like some comfort from their parents.
NPR: This tantrum from scream to whimper took only a minute. But, Green & Potegal argue that no matter how long tantrums last or how often they occur, they follow the same pattern.
The Three Phases of a Tantrum
Phase I: Yelling & screaming. Associated with a high degree of anger. That's how tantrums start, especially if there's a goal the parent has in mind that's different from what the child has in mind.
Phase: 2: Physical actions. Throwing oneself on the floor or throwing something. This signals the downslope of the tantrum. The child has spent a lot of energy, screaming, yelling & physical behaviors.
Phase 3: Crying & whining. This signals the end of the tantrum--what we see after intense physical behaviors. And it can sometimes take only a minute to go from screaming to a whimper. Only now is the child ready to be comforted--and she's ready to listen to mom or dad.
But, no matter how long it takes, from start to finish, all tantrums follow the same pattern!
Learn more:
1. Read the NPR "What's Behind a Temper Tantrum transcript here.
2. Listen to the NPR "What's Behind a Temper Tantrum" radio show here.
3. Access Potegal's & Green's article in Emotion here.
Look Right Here for BPA-Free Cans or Containers
The Go-To Safe Brands: Eden Beans, Muir Glen Canned Tomatoes (started in January 2011), & Foods Packaged in Tetra-Paks or Glass
Just the facts, folks.
BPA is bad news. I'm not going to get into all the nasty details of how this endocrine disruptor can be damaging to pregnant women, fetuses, babies, & children--or how, as a hormone disruptor it's been linked to breast & prostate cancers, attention-deficit disorder, behavioral problems, & even diabetes.
That's all old news.
But, here's the new deal, you might have missed. BPA isn't just in plastic bottles--it's also in the linings of many cans--to prevent corrosion. In fact, until recently, it was found in the linings of practically all canned tomato products. That's now changed, because Muir Glen Organics recently started using BPA-free cans for its tomatoes. Learn more below.
Here's what my friend Fran recently sent me from 7 Foods Experts Won't Eat (and just so you know--Dr. Fredrick vom Saal is THE BPA expert in the US).
Why You Should Avoid Canned Tomatoes (until recently, that is!!)
The Expert: Fredrick vom Saal, PhD, an endocrinologist at the University of Missouri who studies bisphenol-A.
The Situation: The resin linings of tin cans contain bisphenol-A, a synthetic estrogen that has been linked to ailments ranging from reproductive problems to heart disease, diabetes, and obesity.
Unfortunately, acidity (a prominent characteristic of tomatoes) causes BPA to leach into your food. Studies show that the BPA in most people’s body exceeds the amount that suppresses sperm production or causes chromosomal damage to the eggs of animals.
“You can get 50 mcg of BPA per liter out of a tomato can, and that’s a level that is going to impact people, particularly the young,” says vom Saal. “I won’t go near canned tomatoes.”
The Solution: Choose tomatoes in glass bottles (which do not need resin linings), such as the brands Bionaturae and Coluccio. You can also get several types in Tetra Pak boxes, like Trader Joe’s and Pomi. (and Muir Glen tomatoes canned after 1/11)
Muir Glen Canned Tomatoes
Last Friday afternoon I waited on the phone for 45 minutes in order to talk to a Muir Glen customer service rep to find out if Muir Glen tomatoes are really BPA-Free.
To date, there is nothing on their label to indicate that they are BPA-free. So I wanted to hear it from a company representative.
Here's the scoop:
1. The lining will be orange, not white.
2. The expiration date will have a 2014 on it. But..most of my cans have an expiration date of Mar. 2013, & they've all been orange on the inside--which means they're BPA-Free. The 2014 date will give you 100% assurance that the can is BPA-free--but there are 2013 expiration-dated cans that are also BPA-free.
3. Here's another clue. If the can has a white-enameled lining with BPA, it will say so on the label, right near the nutrition facts. Something like: contains enameled lining.
Eden Brand Beans
All Eden Brand Beans come in BPA-free cans. Learn more about that here.
Tetra-Paks or Glass
All food packaged in glass containers or in Tetra-Paks do not have BPA. Some researchers have concerns about the linings of Tetra paks--but, I haven't seen any research on that subject.
The BPA Health Risk Cliff Notes
Here's the new research from JAMA, November 23, 2011
On November 23, 2011, right before Thanksgiving, when millions of Americans were going to open up cans of Campbell's Cream of Mushroom Soup, green beans, Durkee's Onion Rings, pumpkin pie filling, & cranberry sauce---one of the top-dog medical journals, JAMA, busted canned soup for it's sky-high BPA levels. You can read a snippet of the article here.
But, hey, if you had read my Consumer Reports post on canned foods, none of this would have been a big surprise.
Source: Carwile JL, Ye X, Zhou X, Calafat AM, Michels KB, "Canned soup consumption and urinary bisphenol A: a randomized crossover trial," JAMA 2011 Nov 23;306(20):2218-20.
The New York Times on BPA in Cans
If you want a quick summary of the JAMA findings--head over to the New York Time's article written by Anahad O'Connor on November 22, 2011.
"People who ate one serving of canned food daily over the course of five days, the study found, had significantly elevated levels — more than a tenfold increase — of bisphenol-A, or BPA, a substance that lines most food and drink cans.
The new study, which was published [on November 23, 2011] in The Journal of the American Medical Association, is the first to measure the amounts that are ingested when people eat food that comes directly out of a can, in this case soup. The spike in BPA levels that the researchers recorded is one of the highest seen in any study.
“We cannot say from our research what the consequences are,” said Karin Michels, an associate professor of epidemiology at Harvard Medical School and an author of the study.
“But the very high levels that we found are very surprising. We would have never expected a thousand-percent increase in their levels of BPA.”
Dr. Michels noted that all the participants were fed amounts of soup that were smaller than what people probably would consume on their own.
“One serving of soup is a not a lot,” she said. “They were actually telling us that that wasn’t even enough for their lunch.”
But she also pointed out that the findings were probably applicable to other canned goods, including soda and juices.
“The sodas are concerning, because some people have a habit of consuming a lot of them throughout the day,” she said. “My guess is that with other canned foods, you would see similar increases in bisphenol-A. But we only tested soups, so we wouldn’t be able to predict the absolute size of the increase.”
Bring Your Own Popcorn to the Movies!
My Ziploc Bag of Contraband "Barbecue" Popcorn - Is It OK to Bring Your Own?
On Saturday, I worked all day--drove home, downed a quick bowl of soup, popped some popcorn in my hot-air popper to take to the theater--and headed out to see a movie. The plan was to see The Way, but it was sold-out.
We saw The Descendants instead. All four of us gave it a thumbs up. But, I still want to see The Way.
Here's how to make your own Barbecue Air-Popped Popcorn
But, this is supposed to be about bringing your own popcorn.
My husband thinks it's unethical. After all--I do have to "sneak" it into the theater.
But, I say, it's not like I'd eat the theater's popcorn, if I didn't bring my own. Are you kidding?
A medium combo (cola & bag of popcorn) at Regal has 1,610 calories and 60 grams of saturated fat. That's roughly the saturated fat of a stick of butter and the calories of two sticks of butter. To get the low-down on fat & salt content of the movie popcorn you're cluelessly munching, click here.
Chef AJ's Popcorn Experiment--Sugar, Salt, & Fat are the Evil Trifecta
Here's why we love our movie popcorn so much!
With Three Tips--I've Got Three Questions for You:
1. What do you think about the Green & Potegal temper tantrum research? Anyone agree with my adult "temper tantrum" comparison?
2. Do you have concerns about BPA in canned food--or do you kind of ignore the whole thing? I still bought canned tomatoes, so I'm glad Muir Glen made the switch.
3. Do you bring your own popcorn into the theater?
Posted on December 06, 2011 at 03:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (23)
|
|
|
Photo by Vincent Van Der Pas
If you received this via email, click here to get to the web version of this post with graphs, links, & comments.
I hate to start a phone call with,"Sorry, I only have two minutes to talk. But, I just had to tell you, that:
"Sorry, I'll call you later with details. Gotta run."
I have no business posting anything today. I've got to clean my house, shop for Monday's seder, and start cooking, now! Then it's off to the Banff Mountain Film Festival tonight. Woo Hoo. I'm excited. Probably won't have any time to post until next Friday.
This is my two-minute "gotta run--I'll call later", but-I-just-had-to-tell-you-now post!
Oh, and BTW, HHLL just hit over a million blog post views this morning--with readers in 191 countries!
Just Sharing the News- Three Upcoming Events That Can Change Lives
Event #1
On Tuesday, April 19th I have the opportunity to hear Dr. Dean Ornish speak on "The Power of Personalized Lifestyle Changes" at a "closed to the public" Wellness Grand Rounds. Can't wait.
"We tend to think of advances in medicine as a new drug, laser, or surgical procedure--something high-tech and expensive.
This presentation will discuss the power of comprehensive lifestyle changes, reviewing more than 30 years of research using high-tech, state-of-the-art measures to prove the power of low-tech, low-cost, and often ancient interventions.
Also, the lecture will describe proven strategies for motivating people to make and maintain comprehensive lifestyle changes, as well as how to personalize a way of eating and living based on an individual's needs, genes, and preferences.
Finally, the presentation will describe many of the health policy implications of comprehensive lifestyle changes as both medically effective and cost effective."
Event #2
On Thursday, April 21st I'm attending the following Slate "The Hive"/Cleveland Clinic: Fighting Childhood Obesity National Forum--8:30-12:15 am. Registration is open & online. Click here.
Read more about the background behind this event, here.
Event #3
Consider attending a 3-day low-cost wellness weekend event in beautiful Athens, Ohio on May 19-21, that's open to the public, and co-sponsored by Ohio University Colleges of Health Professions & the Ohio University College of Osteopathics Medicine. Click here for more information.
It's an opportunity to see & hear many of the pioneers who are responsible for newest trend in "low-tech" "low-cost" disease reversal through plant-based nutrition: Dr. Caldwell B. Esselstyn, Jr., Dr. T. Colin Campbell, Jeff Novick, MS,RD, Dr. Hans Diehl, Rip Esselstyn, and many others.

Health Summit Links:
Our Speakers
Conference Registration
Accommodations
Friday Conference for:
Employers
Health Professionals
Social Service/Community
Free Saturday Conference:
Healthy Living Workshops
Dr. Greenlaw is founder and president of a prominent gastroenterology group since 1975. He received his MD in internal medicine from the University of Missouri, completed a gastroenterology fellowship at Yale, and served on the faculty of the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford, attaining the rank of Clinical Professor of Medicine. Dr. Greenlaw is board certified in Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology, and Holistic Medicine. Dr. Greenlaw practices holistic gastroenterology with an emphasis on lifestyle medicine. www.rockforfgi.com
Dr. Kelly completed an MD/MPH degree program at Loma Linda University School of Medicine in 2000 and his Master's of Public Health in Epidemiology in 2002. Dr. Kelly is the primary architect and Founding President of the American College of Lifestyle Medicine (ACLM) and was a recipient of the AMA Foundation's Excellence in Medicine Leadership Award in 2004. Dr. Kelly's lifestyle medicine practice is located in Rocky Mount, Virginia. www.lifestylehealthdoc.com.
Author and recovered yoyo dieter, Dr. May delivers her crucial and timely message with passion, energy, and humor that transforms the way her audiences view weight management. She is the award-winning author of Am I Hungry? What to Do When Diets Don't Work and Eat What You Love, Love What You Eat: How to Break Your Eat-Repent-Repeat Cycle which reinforces her powerful message for lasting change. She founded Am IHungry?(r) Workshops, and won the Excellence in Patient Education Innovation Award. She has trained over 170 Am I Hungry?(r) Facilitators worldwide. www.amihungry.com.
With over 24 years of experience as a nutritionist and dietitian, Mr. Novick offers an insightful and humorous approach to nutrition and health. He holds both bachelor and graduate degrees in Nutrition from Indiana State University. Currently, Mr. Novick serves as Vice President for Executive Health Exams International, Adjunct Professor at the School of Health Sciences for Kaplan University, and lectures at the McDougall program in Santa Rosa, CA. www.jeffnovick.com
As a consulting company, Bravo Wellness offers services and tools to business partners desiring results-based wellness programs. Their successes have been unequaled in the industry. Bravo's founder, Jim Pshock, has been at the forefront of the use of result-based wellness incentives since 2004. Mr. Pshock has worked closely with the Department of Labor, Internal Revenue Service and Centers for Medicaid and Medicare to understand the practical application of these new regulations and is uniquely positioned to lead this initiative. www.bravowell.com
Dr. Snow is a third year Endocrinology and Metabolism Fellow at the University of Virginia, where he has helped to start an insulin resistance clinic in 2009 to treat patients who have type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome and obesity with lifestyle interventions and a vegan diet. He received the National Institutes of Health Ruth R. Kirschstein National Research Service Award for his ongoing study of the impact of plant based nutrition on insulin resistant type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Dr. Thorner is a David C. Harrison Teaching Professor of Internal Medicine at the University of Virginia, is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, of the Royal College of Physicians (London), and Master of the American College of Physicians. His current research is on the epidemic of diabetes and obesity with patients who have these conditions and their responses to supervised lifestyle changes which have allowed them to stop insulin therapy. Dr. Thorner, Dr. Snow and others are assembling a model of how the normal homeostatic mechanisms are subverted by a modern lifestyle and the Western diet.
Dr. Aldana has published over 60 scientific articles on the prevention, arrest, and reversal of America's most common chronic diseases. He has written 7 books on the ability of healthy lifestyle habits to prevent cardiovascular disease, cancers, diabetes, and many chronic diseases. His most recent book, The Culprit and The Cure is currently being used by over 4,500 companies and corporations in an effort to boost productivity and reduce employee related health expenses. The Harvard School of Public Health says this book is "better than the best medicines". www.stevealdana.com
For more than 40 years, Dr. Colin Campbell has been at the forefront of nutrition research. His legacy, the China Study, is the most comprehensive study of health and nutrition ever conducted. The study was a partnership project between the Chinese and American governments that produced statistically significant associations between various dietary factors and disease. Dr. Campbell is a Professor Emeritus of Nutritional Biochemistry at Cornell University. He received his master's degree and PhD from Cornell, served as a Research Associate at MIT, and taught at Virginia Tech for 10 years before returning to Cornell Chair. www.tcolincampbell.org.
Dr. Demas has a Ph.D. in education, nutrition, and anthropology from Cornell University. She is the founder and director of the Food Studies Institute, based in Trumansburg, New York, a non-profit devoted to improving the long-term health and education of children. Her curriculum, Food Is Elementary, has been used successfully in more than 2,000 schools in 33 states. She consults, trains, and certifies teachers as food educators in the U.S. and abroad. Dr. Demas is a Visiting Scholar at Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health and at the University of Illinois Medical School. www.foodstudies.org
Dr. Diehl is an epidemiologically trained lifestyle interventionist with a doctorate in Health Science and a Masters in Public Health Nutrition, both from Loma Linda University, where he is a Clinical Professor of Preventive Medicine. Dr. Diehl directs of the Lifestyle Medicine Institute in California and is founder of the CHIP Program (Coronary Health Improvement Project). With more than 50,000 alumni, CHIP advocates a healthier lifestyle to prevent and reverse diseases. His book "Health Power" has sold over 2 million copies. www.chiphealth.com
Dr. Edington is the director of the University of Michigan's Health Management Research Center. Dr. Edington's research focuses on the precursors of disease and vitality. His interest is in the relationships between healthy lifestyles, vitality and quality of life, as they benefit both individuals and organizations. He is specifically interested in how individual health promotion, worksite wellness activities and programs within organizations impact health care cost containment, productivity, and human resource development. www.hmrc.umich.edu
Dr. Esselstyn has been associated with the Cleveland Clinic since 1968. During that time he served as President of the Staff and as a member of the Board of Governors. In 2005, he became the first recipient of the Benjamin Spock Award for Compassion in Medicine. In 1995, he published his benchmark long-term nutritional study: arresting and reversing coronary artery disease in severely ill patients. Twelve years later he updated and published the study in his book Prevent and Reverse Heart Disease. www.heartattackproof.com.
Rip was born in upper New York state and moved to Austin Texas to become an All-American swimmer. After spending 10 years as a professional triathlete Rip joined the Austin Fire Department in 1997. His New York Times bestseller "Engine2 Diet" contains a groundbreaking nutritional program with indisputable, dramatic results in lowering cholesterol and losing weight in just 4 weeks. For more information log on to: www.engine2diet.com.
Professor of Endocrinology, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine (OU-COM), Dept. of Specialty Medicine; J. O. Watson, D.O., Chair for Diabetes Research and the Director; ARHI Diabetes Endocrine Center at OU-COM. His clinical practice addresses all diseases related to the endocrine system; pituitary, thyroid, parathyroid, adrenal, ovary, testis and metabolic diseases such as diabetes or metabolic bone disease. The center was designed to meet the complex health care challenges of the diabetes epidemic in the country and specifically in Appalachia. Under his direction the ARHI Diabetes/Endocrine Center has established outreach programs in several underserved cities in the region.
Panel Discussion Moderator: "Putting it all together: Action Steps for a Healthier Appalachia"
Posted on April 16, 2011 at 11:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
|
"Is that piece of chocolate an innocent indulgence? Or your next hit? We're finding that a sweet tooth makes you just as much an addict as snorting cocaine.
SETTLED on the sofa watching the usual rubbish on TV, I notice that predictable, uncontrollable, nightly craving. At first I sit there, fighting it. But the longer I fight, the worse it gets. After 20 minutes, I can't concentrate on anything, I feel anxious, and start fidgeting like crazy. Finally, admitting my addiction, I break. I go to the freezer - to my stash of white stuff - and take a hit. Almost instantly, I relax, my brain in a state of bliss as the chemical courses through my veins. Isn't it amazing what a few scoops of ice cream can do?
Before you dismiss my agitation as mere weakness, consider this: to my brain, sugar is akin to cocaine. There is now compelling evidence that foods high in sugar, fat and salt - as most junk foods are - can alter your brain chemistry in the same way as highly addictive drugs such as cocaine and heroin.Junk foods switch on biological mechanisms that are just as hard to fight as recreational drugs."
-Bijal Trivedi, "Junkie Food: Tastes Your Brain Can't Resist," New Scientist, Sept. 8, 2010-
If you received this via email, click here to get the web version with the links & photos.
On Monday my husband made a double-batch of Rip Esselstyn's Engine 2 Dark Chocolate Brownies. He needed to bring something to his Master Gardener meeting--and he figured that as long as he was pulling out all that baking stuff--he'd make a batch for us, too.
Big mistake! Take my advice. Do not make these brownies. Do not have sugary treats in the house. Just because they don't use butter or oil or eggs--and just because they use cocoa and whole wheat flour--doesn't mean they're good for you. And it doesn't mean you'll eat less of them.
I rarely eat sugar or cookies or baked goods. Really. But if they're in MY HOUSE--who can resist that temptation? I ate three brownies--one right after the other--and honestly, I physically felt "not so good".
Your "Must Read" This Week: Gary Taubes Looks at the Research in the New York Times Magazine - Is Sugar Toxic?
Gary Taubes' excellent NYT Magazine article will appear this Sunday, April 17, 2011. Here's the link--enjoy! Well, maybe "enjoy" isn't exactly the right word. Change that to: Worry, Wonder, Question, Quit Eating Sugar?
If you're a regular blog reader, you know all about the subject of Taubes' article--It starts with Dr. Robert Lustig and his viral YouTube video--"Sugar: The Bitter Truth". If you missed that post, you can read it here--and skip Lustig's 90 minute video--which was a taping of his University of San Francisco Mini-Medical School Lecture.
My Advice--Read the Article - But Here's a Taste--Teaser
Taubes gets right down to the bottom line, "This brings us to the salient question: Can sugar possibly be as bad as Lustig says it is?"
"If I didn’t buy this argument myself, I wouldn’t be writing about it here," says Taubes.
[For]Varman Samuel, who studies insulin resistance at Yale School of Medicine, the correlation between liver fat and insulin resistance in patients, lean or obese, is “remarkably strong.” What it looks like, Samuel says, is that “when you deposit fat in the liver, that’s when you become insulin-resistant.”
The Cancer Connection: One of the diseases that increases in incidence with obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome is cancer.
This is why I said earlier that insulin resistance may be a fundamental underlying defect in many cancers, as it is in type 2 diabetes and heart disease. The connection between obesity, diabetes and cancer was first reported in 2004 in large population studies by researchers from the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer.
It is not controversial. What it means is that you are more likely to get cancer if you’re obese or diabetic than if you’re not, and you’re more likely to get cancer if you have metabolic syndrome than if you don’t.
Cancer Is Rare in Non-Western Diets. The second observation was that malignant cancer, like diabetes, was a relatively rare disease in populations that didn’t eat Western diets, and in some of these populations it appeared to be virtually nonexistent.
Now most researchers will agree that the link between Western diet or lifestyle and cancer manifests itself through this association with obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome — i.e., insulin resistance. This was the conclusion, for instance, of a 2007 report published by the World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research — “Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity and the Prevention of Cancer.”
How Does Insulin Resistance Promote Cancer? So how does it work? Cancer researchers now consider that the problem with insulin resistance is that it leads us to secrete more insulin, and insulin (as well as a related hormone known as insulin-like growth factor) actually promotes tumor growth.
As it was explained to me by Craig Thompson, who has done much of this research and is now president of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, the cells of many human cancers come to depend on insulin to provide the fuel (blood sugar) and materials they need to grow and multiply. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor (and related growth factors) also provide the signal, in effect, to do it.
The more insulin, the better they do. Some cancers develop mutations that serve the purpose of increasing the influence of insulin on the cell; others take advantage of the elevated insulin levels that are common to metabolic syndrome, obesity and type 2 diabetes. Some do both.
Thompson believes that many pre-cancerous cells would never acquire the mutations that turn them into malignant tumors if they weren’t being driven by insulin to take up more and more blood sugar and metabolize it.
Is the problem caused by sugar or obesity or both? But some researchers will make the case, as Cantley and Thompson do, that if something other than just being fatter is causing insulin resistance to begin with, that’s quite likely the dietary cause of many cancers.
If it’s sugar that causes insulin resistance, they say, then the conclusion is hard to avoid that sugar causes cancer — some cancers, at least — radical as this may seem and despite the fact that this suggestion has rarely if ever been voiced before publicly. For just this reason, neither of these men (Cantley & Thompson) will eat sugar or high-fructose corn syrup, if they can avoid it.
“I have eliminated refined sugar from my diet and eat as little as I possibly can,” Thompson told me, “because I believe ultimately it’s something I can do to decrease my risk of cancer.” Cantley put it this way: “Sugar scares me.”
If you ask me it's not just about sugar. And it's not just about fat. It's about both! And we have more to be concerned about than just cancer! What about heart disease, stroke, arthritis, joint problems, dementia, the disability that comes with obesity, and more?
Sugar isn't the sole disease driver of this disability bus. It's also too much dietary fat, insufficient intake of vegetables & fruit, too little fiber from refined grains, too many calories, and not enough exercise!
My comment on Taubes' article in this morning's New York Times, sums up what I believe.
"Fantastic summary of the research by Taubes! Thank you.
Americans overconsume everything that tastes great--sugar & fat & salt. We're programmed to do it.
The worst part---they fill us up, and we have far less interest in the real stuff with all the nutrition---vegetables, fruits & whole grains.
I "mostly" ditched sugar 2 years ago. Nine months ago I ditched the fat. We can argue all we like---but my weight is down to college weight---and I'm 61--and I eat EVERYTHING "healthy & real" that I want to eat! And as much as I want to eat.
Couldn't feel better--and BP & lipids are now perfect. No more belly fat. It's not just about the sugar. It's about the fat, too. Never lost a pound by just ditching sugar!"-The Healthy Librarian, NYT 4/13/11-
-
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 09:10 AM | Permalink | Comments (11) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
|
Fruit Juice, Soda Pop, Sugar, Honey, Maple Syrup, Agave--Avoid Them All
If Mary Poppins hadn't supplied the spoonful of sugar, maybe her charges wouldn't have needed the medicine in the first place!
Dr. Robert H. Lustig, "Just a spoonful of sugar helps the blood pressure go up," Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Nov;8(11):1497-9.
If you received this post via email, click here to get to the web version with the not-to-be-missed video & all the links.
Two years ago I decided to "mostly" ditch the sugar from my life. After "winning" a raffle of three giant boxes of truffles at a work Christmas party, and then downing more of them than I'm embarrassed to admit, I decided to just swear off sugar. But, mostly it was about ditching all the saturated fat that's always wrapped up in the kind sugar I craved--like chocolate chip cookies, "heart healthy" 85% cacao bars, and chocolate desserts.
Beyond all the empty calories & fat wrapped up in my kind of sugary faves--two years ago I had no idea how bad sugar really was--but I do now.
Right now I'm on a "Bitter Truth of Sugar" High. And I'm hoping to convince you all to find the 90 minutes it will take to watch Dr. Robert H. Lustig's eye-opening University of California at San Francisco's "Mini-Medical School" lecture, "Sugar: The Bitter Truth". Sure, it's a huge amount of time to stare at a computer screen, but it just may change your life--or at least what you put into your mouth. And I guarantee it will change what you feed your children or grandchildren. Take a measly 15 minutes each day to watch it, bit by bit. You won't regret it.
Honestly, I don't even know where to start when it comes to sharing Dr. Robert H. Lustig's story about how bad sugar is for us. I first listened to him on my recent flight to Florida via a podcast of his interview with Joe & Terry Graedon on the People's Pharmacy. I quickly followed that up on Sunday by watching his UC-SF mini-med school lecture, thanks to a recommendation from a physician blog reader in Michigan. Thank you, Dr. H!
It's not a simple story to tell. It's like trying to condense a 1000 page "who-done-it", that's a story of political intrigue, corporate greed, addiction, dietary indiscretion, consumer ignorance, complicated physiological biochemistry, and medical research all rolled into one. The story includes Richard Nixon, the 1973 Agricultural Secy'. Earl Butz, the sugar & farm lobby, presidential elections, the food industry, brain chemistry, liver metabolism, our taste buds and more--all conspiring to make us fat and sick. Oh my! Two years ago I wrote about a part of this story in: King Corn - and the Real Story Behind the Demise of the Family Farm, the Rise in Obesity, Type II Diabetes & Fast Food.
Bottom Line: Sugar has proved to be a major villain in our escalating rates of obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dental caries, inflammation, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome--to name a few. And it's not just because sugar is empty calories--it goes way beyond that! It's a downright toxic substance--with adverse affects pretty similar to those of alcohol! No matter what kind of sugar you can think of, it's all fructose--and fructose is a poison. And I thought fructose was harmless substance! Here's the deal: once fructose is extracted from a plant's fiber--it becomes bad news.
Lustig's Mantra: When G-d made the poison, it was packaged with the antidote--like fruit--which is fiber and juice.
Wherever there's fructose in nature, there's way more fiber. The only exception is honey, and that's guarded by bees! G-d made it hard to get "fructose sugar" without eating the fiber.
The problem is: Man figured out a way to extract it! Not only has man made it easy to get--but the food industry has made it impossible to avoid!
Pre-1975, before the invention of high-fructose corn syrup, Americans ate 63 pounds of sugar a year--today we're up to 156 pounds. That's 22 teaspoons a day. The American Heart Association's 2009 Scientific Statement recommends the maximum to be 6 teaspoons for women--9 teaspooons for men.
Who Is Dr. Robert H. Lustig and Why Should We Believe What He Says?
Lustig has the credentials, the clinical and research experience to be an expert on how sugar damages our bodies. He's a professor of clinical pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at the University of California, San Francisco, where he directs the Weight Assessment for Teen and Child Health (WATCH) Program. His specialty is neuroendocrinology, with a specific emphasis on the regulation of energy balance by the central nervous system. He's working with overweight and obese kids who either have type-2 diabetes--or are on their way to getting it. As a neuroendocrinologist he's an expert in the appetite and satiety hormones of ghrelin and leptin.
He's also a major player in the field of pediatric obesity & has published numerous articles in top medical journals. Click here for his bibliography. Not to mention that a large UK study, just published online yesterday in the American Heart Association's journal, Hypertension, "Sugar-Sweetened Beverage, Sugar Intake of Individuals, and Their Blood Pressure. International Study of Macro/Micronutrients and Blood Pressure", backs him up on the association of sugar to hypertension. Lustig knows what he's talking about.
If you aren't seeing the video click here.
What's So Bad About Sugar?
What Do I Mean By Sugar?
They're all the same. They are sucrose--which is 1/2 fructose, and 1/2 glucose.
Glucose is good. It's the energy of life. All carbohydrates are glucose--the starches, the pastas, the beans & legumes. It gives us energy--it can be used by every cell and every organ in our body.
Fructose, on the other hand, is bad news once it's separated from the fiber of whole fruit or plants. It's completely different from glucose.
Listen closely: fructose is metabolized ONLY in the liver and it's metabolized just like fat. No other organ in the body can metabolize it--and instead of generating energy--it ends up generating FAT. That's right, the liver turns fructose straight into fat cells--and when your liver generates fat, it becomes insulin-resistant (hepatic insulin-resistance). So, if you're eating a high-sugar diet--you might as well say you're on a high-fat diet.
What's so bad about insulin-resistance? When the liver becomes insulin-resistant--it drives up your insulin levels, so instead of burning the energy from the food you are eating, you store even more of it as fat in your cells, driving you to eat even more. Here's why. As Lustig explains it, sugar/soda pop/juice/dessert-eating Americans are releasing about twice the insulin than they were 25 years ago--and all that extra insulin is driving the food we eat to get stored as more fat, which makes us even more insulin-resistant.
"The higher the insulin goes, the more food you want to eat & the less well your brain is able to get the signal from your gut that you're full. Leptin, the satiety hormone, is effectively disabled in the presence of insulin-resistance, and you can blame that on all the sugar/fructose that the liver turned into fat.
The calories-in calories-out theory doesn't work in insulin-resistance or when you're eating too much "sugar/aka fructose"--because once the liver turns the fructose into fat cells you just aren't going to be able to burn all your calories, because they're trapped in your fat cells--unless you want to starve yourself. And no one's about to do that.
When leptin isn't being released the way it's supposed to--as happens in insulin-resistance--your brain doesn't know you've already had enough to eat. It thinks you're starving--so you just eat more. You end up in a vicious cycle of consumption and then disease." (Lustig, People's Pharmacy interview)
The Fructose-Cholesterol Connection: When it comes to LDL, the low-density lipoproteins, there are two types: a "neutral" one & a bad one. The harmless one is large, fluffy, buoyant, and kind of bounces around. It's just too big to get into the endothelial lining of your blood vessels and start the whole atherosclerosis & inflammation process. But, the small-dense ones are the ones to worry about, because they can burrow right under the endothelium--and according to Lustig: Fructose is the biggest generator of small-dense LDL's! Just ditch the sugar if you care about your arteries & blood vessels!
Note: In typical cholesterol tests the LDLs are measured with one number, with no differentiation between the fluffy (neutral) & the small dense (bad) kind. To get a reading on what kind of lipid particles you have, you need an NMR-lipoProfile test. And don't forget about the triglycerides--they're also driven up by sugar.
Last year research out of Emory University confirmed a statistically significant connection between sweetener consumption & lipid levels, Welsh, JA et al. JAMA, April 21, 2010 33:1490-96, "Caloric Sweetner Consumption and Dyslipidemia Among US Adults" Click here for the article.
Think the Less Processed Sugars, like Agave, Maple Syrup, Brown Rice Syrup, or Fruit Juice Are a Better Choice? Think again. Part of the Esselstyn diet includes specific instructions to avoid sugar & fruit juice--because of their connection to cholesterol--insulin-resistance-- and type-2 diabetes. Esselstyn even advises his patients to limit whole fruit to 2 pieces a day--or 3 if that includes berries or grapes. Too bad, so many plant-based no-oil advocates (myself included) don't think twice about using what we think are better sugar choices--like agave or maple syrup. Sorry to say, they're just as bad as high-fructose corn syrup, as far as the liver is concerned!
The Fructose-Disease Connection--Just a Few for Starters
The Sugar Cure--Exercise, Fiber, Whole Foods, No Sugar, No Juice
Why is Exercise Important to Improved Insulin Sensitivity & Weight Control?
Why is Fiber So Important to Insulin Sensitivity and Weight Control?
Lustig's Rules for His UCSF WATCH Pediatric/Teen Patients
Does it work? Yes!
Disturbing Lustig Observations:
Lustig's Advice for Adults
1. Eat only real food, that comes from the ground.
2. No processed food, because that usually has sugar added to it--and the fiber removed--the 2 things that are driving the obesity & chronic metabolic disease epidemic.
3. Shop the perimeter of the supermarket--not the aisles. If it's in a box--it's often processed for shelf life--sugar-added, fiber-removed.
4. Eat only whole-grain bread--that's not the same as whole wheat bread--the fiber is in the whole grain--and the starch stays in the husk in the kernel, which slows the sugar & glucose absorption, so your insulin stys low.
5. A calorie is not a calorie--and fructose is NOT glucose.
6. Fructose is a chronic hepatoxin--It's alcohol without the "buzz".
Lustigism: If you reduce the rate of carbohydrate absorption in your gut by eating a high fiber diet--the bacteria will get to it. Which means, in life you have just two choices: It's fart or be fat. The decision is yours!
Any changes all this means for me? Not much. I eat plenty of fiber and exercise already. Sugary desserts are rare treats for me. But, I always eat wedding cake! Haven't had sugared soda pop in years. I'll still use a little maple syrup, agave, or even brown sugar for occasional recipes. I sweeten my coffee with unadulterated stevia. I'll think twice about ordering a pina colada, a margarita, or a mojito! But I'm sure I'll still have one a few times a year. I am going to eliminate pure juice from my Green Smoothies. And I definitely will try hard to resist feeding my grandson cookies & ice cream.
Posted on March 03, 2011 at 04:26 AM | Permalink | Comments (31) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
|
Back in early May I posted about my preview of the Julia Grayer-Gage Johnston documentary, "Chow Down". So many people emailed me back then to find out how to order a copy and see it for themselves--but at the time it hadn't been released.
Yeah! It's finally out. Julia Grayer, the writer-producer-director emailed me with the good news & the ordering info. You can purchase your own copy or stream it via Amazon, by clicking here. It's that rare combination of a movie that will have you laughing, learning, & rethinking what's going into your mouth all at the same time. A 3-fer. Kind of like the thinking-person's healthy hoot. Enjoy! And if you missed the May 3rd post--here's your refresher.
One man’s struggle to reverse his severe heart disease .... with diet.
Charles, 45, devoted husband and father of two, is shocked to learn not only that he has cardiovascular disease but that the blockages in his heart are so severe that his surgeon refuses to operate. But Charles is a fighter and he’ll do whatever it takes to be around to see his kids grow up.
Just like Charles, millions of Americans are sick and they’re tired of the pills and operations. What if you could avoid it all, but nobody’s willing to tell you how?
Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn of the Cleveland Clinic is trampling the status quo to get the word out. He’s the director of one of the longest-running studies in the peer-reviewed scientific literature showing that a plant-based diet can reverse even late stage heart disease. If heart disease, the number one killer in America, can be stopped and often reversed with diet, why aren't people like Charles routinely given this information before being sent to the operating room?
-Synopsis of "Chow Down: Eat Like Your Life Depends On It?-
If you received this via email click here to go to the web version with all the links & video trailers.
Back in April Ann Esselstyn lent me a copy of Chow Down: Eat Like Your Life Depends On It--a Julia Grayer/Gage Johnston documentary that was 4 years in the making! Click here for the film's website.
I finally had a chance to watch it with my husband last night, and...
Our verdict? We both loved it! Nothing dull or dry about this documentary. It's lighthearted, clever, controversial, with cool animation to help explain the technical stuff--and it tells the truth. So go out & find yourself a copy!
Bottom Line: Over 130 million Americans have a chronic illness--and 70% of deaths are caused by those chronic illnesses. Type 2 Diabetes and heart disease can be prevented or reversed--and 60% of all cancers can be prevented--just by putting to use the knowledge we already have. The answer isn't in pills and procedures--it's in eating a well-planned plant-based diet. But it takes time, preparation, a shift in your food taste preferences, and above all--motivation and support from family, friends, and a healthcare professional. And that's certainly been true for me.
How Did We Get Into This Mess? Why Isn't This Information Front Page News?Just follow the money. The food and drug industries are not looking out for our health. And our government & medical "industries" have their own vested interests in the status quo. There's profit in cheap sweet fatty salty unhealthy food. There's profit in pharmaceuticals and medical procedures. And who knew the U.S. Department of Agriculture was more of a lobbying agency for farmers than a guardian of our health. They're the folks who advise us about what to eat with their Food Pyramid--and provide food for school lunches. It's like the fox guarding the hen house.
The meat & dairy industries--the big players--get 74% of our agricultural subsidies. Less than 1/2 of 1 percent goes to fruit & vegetable farmers. Hmm.
According to Dr. Neal Barnard, the generic ads we see for beef and milk are funded from government programs. The federal government at one time even worked with Wendy's to help create the Cheddar Lover's Beef Burger to sell more cheese--and the same with Subway.
Can You Really Change Your Health By Changing Your Diet? Yes, You Can.
Charles Venezia: a young father, who was a meat-lover, a vegetable-hater, a hypertensive since age 16, with multiple coronary blockages so severe his surgeon refused to operate. His choices: disability, death, or a diet change. He chose a diet change--with support from Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn.
Before:
Blood Pressure: 250/155
Weight: 360 lbs.
Cholesterol: 220
After:
Blood Pressure: 120/80
Weight: not mentioned but he looks fantastic--and healthy!
Cholesterol: 140
He's had no coronary events and he leads a full active life.
Charles
is 100% committed to eating plant-based, and he's fortunate to have a
highly motivated wife who is willing to spend the time it takes to shop
and prepare plant-based fare. But it wasn't easy for Charles, the son
of a butcher. For him this change was a complete paradigm shift--he
still misses his meat and he misses restaurant eating, "It's not fun. It doesn't taste all that great. But I'm not going to have a heart attack." He
also follows up regularly with Dr. Esselstyn. Even Charles' young
children are following the program--eating 75-80% healthy plant-based
fare.
My comment to Charles: Come on over to my house & eat. Our meals are 100% tastier & more interesting than anything I used to make that involved beef or chicken!
Charles
and John Oehrle are just two of hundreds of patients seen by Dr.
Esselstyn who have stopped or reversed their heart disease, arrested
their diabetes, returned to normal weight, lowered their blood
pressure, and regained their health by switching to a plant-based (no
meat or dairy) diet of:
Cardiac Procedures & Statins Don't Cure Disease
Esselstyn is fond of saying:
"The Elelphant in the room is that procedures really don't prolong life. Stents, bypasses, dialysis--none of it works."
John Oehrle's Philadelphia surgeon told him: Procedures are just a temporary patch job. These procedures do nothing to cure the diseases. When we do these operations we put a band-aid on these people. It doesn't treat the disease. They have to do that for themselves.
Taking statins and not changing your diet does not "cure cardiovascular disease"--and almost 1/2 of men who have a heart attack before age 65 are dead within 8 years.
Think this doesn't apply to you because you don't have diagnosed heart disease? Big coronary blockages only cause 12% of the heart attacks. Most of the time it's the little arterial plaques that cause 88% of blockages--3 small blockages are a ticking time bomb--and you won't even know it! Your coronary artery has to be 70% occluded to have symptoms, like angina. If your arteries are even 10-69% blocked, and you're inflaming them with what you eat, you're at risk. It's all about inflammation - Calm down the inflammation & you'll keep those atherosclerotic plaques safely stuck to your artery walls.
Bottom Line: Operations don't cure everything. You have to do that yourself with serious diet & lifestyle changes.
Dr. Hans Diehl on the Benefits of Diet: "As we treat heart disease with diet we also help to prevent strokes, fragility, dementia, blood pressure, and the common cancers like breast and prostate. It's probably one common disease that expresses itself in different ways."
What Keeps Us From Making Drastic Diet & Lifestyle Changes?Click here for a great animated video explaining how a heart attack happens--or if you don't see the Chow Down trailer on your screen.
To read more about Dr. Esselstyn, and a heart-healthy diet:
Yes, You Can Prevent & Reverse Heart Disease - But Are You Up for the Challenge? Let Dr. Esselstyn Convince You!
Some Q & A From The Esselstyn Father & Son Team: The Plant Strong Fireman & The Plant Perfect Doctor
Posted on August 26, 2010 at 04:19 AM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
|
What has happened to us? Despite the most advanced medical technology in the world, we are sicker than ever by nearly every measure.
Two out of every three of us are overweight. Cases of diabetes are exploding, especially amongst our younger population.
About half of us are taking at least one prescription drug. Major medical operations have become routine, helping to drive health care costs to astronomical levels.
Heart disease, cancer and stroke are the country’s three leading causes of death, even though billions are spent each year to “battle” these very conditions. Millions suffer from a host of other degenerative diseases.Could it be there’s a single solution to all of these problems? A solution so comprehensive but so utterly straightforward, that it’s mind-boggling that more of us haven’t taken it seriously?
-Forks Over Knives, a documentary that explores the evidence of "food as medicine", coming March 11, 2011-
If you received this post via email, Click Here to get to the web version & all the links.
For my 1/29/11 updated post about the film when I saw it at a "Big Screen" sneak preview--click here
I can say this wholeheartedly. When this movie comes out this summer, make sure you see it.
My whole view of what constitutes a healthy diet turned upside-down two years ago when Dr. T. Colin Campbell presented a lecture on "Can Medical Practice Tolerate Nutritional Intervention?" at the major medical center where I work. To read "T. Colin Campbell Pays a Visit: Does This Mean I Have to Become a Vegan?"
Four months later I just happened upon a NPR-affiliate's interview with Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn about the prevention and reversal of heart disease. Click here to read: "Yes, You Can Prevent and Reverse Heart Disease, But Are You Up for the Challenge? Let Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn Convince You"
Their evidence speaks for itself. A whole-foods plant-based diet can prevent, and often undo all the damage that our "too-rich diets of affluence" have caused: obesity, heart disease, type-2 diabetes, many cancers, hypertension, strokes, and osteoporosis.
Campbell & Esselstyn were both born in the early 1930's. They both grew up on farms. Eating beef and drinking milk was what they knew. But by the 1980's both men, one a Cornell University research scientist and the chair of the division of Nutritional Sciences, and the other, a Cleveland Clinic surgeon, had turned their backs on their past, and were advocating a whole-food plant-based diet.
For Campbell--getting enough animal protein--enough milk and meat was important to good health. Back then he believed milk was nature's most perfect food. In fact, his original research was on the optimal feed for animals. But, he's a scientist--so in spite of his background and his original biases, when all the evidence started pointing in the direction of animal protein as the cause of many of our chronic diseases, he set out to investigate--first to the Philippines to find out why so many children there were mysteriously being diagnosed with liver cancer, then by conducting numerous laboratory studies on the effects of animal protein on cancer, and finally traveling to China, to conduct the largest "living human laboratory" epidemiologic study ever designed.
Campbell's conclusion: There is not one single mechanism in a plant-based diet that is responsible for its health promoting effects. It's not about individual nutrients. It's the 100,000 chemicals from plant foods that work together synergistically that bring about good health. Good nutrition supported by exercise, water, and sunshine is greater than the sum of its parts. It's a biological symphony.
-T. Colin Campbell, from Forks Over Knives-"People who ate the most animal-based foods got the most chronic disease...People who ate the most plant-based foods were the healthiest and tended to avoid chronic disease. These results could not be ignored."
"I know of nothing else in medicine that can come close to what a plant-based diet can do."
"I can say this with a great deal of confidence. Our national authorities are simply excluding this concept of nutrition from the debate in order to protect the status quo. If everyone would do this, we'd cut health care costs by 70-85%."
"The major message from the China Study--is the only message--a plant-food-based diet, mainly cereal grains, vegetables & fruit, and very little animal food, is always associated with lower mortality of certain cancers, stroke, and coronary heart disease."
--Dr.Junshi Chen, Senior Research Professor, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China, and co-investigator of the "China Study" with Dr. T. Colin Campbell-
For Esselstyn--trained as a surgeon, and trained to treat disease by cutting it out--he chose to specialize in breast cancer surgery. But in the 1980's he was "increasingly disillusioned by what he was not doing-- never curing the underlying disease, never doing anything to help prevent it in the next unsuspecting victim".
That led him to delve into the research of populations with low incidences of breast & prostate cancer--and then on to populations with low incidences of heart disease--and then noticing the dramatic rise and fall of heart disease in war-time Norway when the Germans commandeered all of Norway's beef & dairy cattle for their own troops. He connected the dots--to the inescapable conclusion that animal protein was disease-causing, while plant protein was not. The result turned into the initiation of the longest-running study (over 20 years) of heart disease reversal based on a diet devoid of animal protein--just beans, legumes, whole grains, vegetables, and fruit--hold the oil, please.
"Some people think the "diet" is extreme. Half a million people a year will have their chests opened up and a vein taken from their leg and sewn onto their coronary artery. Some people would call that extreme."
"The elephant in the room when we talk about stents and bypass surgery--those procedures don't protect from new heart attacks. Stents & bypasses are used to treat large arterial blockages. Yet according to many research studies only a small percentage of heart attacks are caused by the largest build-up of plaque. The rest are caused by the more numerous newer blockages that are far more inflamed and much more likely to rupture than the larger older, more stable plaques. So this is why those procedures don't treat the disease. They are treating the symptoms."
--Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn--
Why do I personally find the work and message of Campbell and Esselstyn so compelling?
If you don't have the time to read Dr. T. Colin Campbell's The China Study and Dr. Caldwell B. Esselstyn's Prevent and Reverse Heart Disease, do yourself a huge favor & go see this film. For me, Forks Over Knives did what these books could not.
Yep, I know this sounds like snake-oil, but let the evidence speak for itself. Two years ago I made the switch over to plant-based and now it's just part of my routine. I can't see any reason to go back.
The Real-Time Health Turn-Around of Lee Fulkerson, Joey of Tampa, and SanDera of Cleveland
To be honest, I'm a skeptic at heart. I never fall for magical transformations with pills, supplements, or diets. I need to see the scientific evidence. And I need to understand the mechanism behind how something works.
But, for me, absolutely nothing beats the triple punch of: scientific evidence, understanding the mechanism of action, and seeing a real person's successful transformation.
Meet Lee Fulkerson, the writer and director of Forks Over KnivesAfter:
Weight: 211 pounds (was 231 pounds)
Blood Pressure: 112/70 (was 142/82)
Resting heart rate: 60 (was 92)
Total Cholesterol: 154 (was 241)
LDL: 80 (was 157)
CRP (marker of inflammation) 2.8 (was 6)
He's not on any medications, and his health risks are now significantly reduced--just by changing his diet.
Meet Joey, owner of a landscape company in Tampa, FLAfter:
Weight: he's lost an additional 28 pounds--his before and after pictures are nothing short of amazing
Medical complaints: 26 out of his 27 medical complaints are gone
CRP: down to normal
Blood sugar: they are down, and continue to come down daily
Cholesterol: in the normal range, and less than when he was on medication
Blood Pressure: it's now normal, and even on medication it was elevated
He's off all of his medications, his numbers continue to improve. He looks almost unrecognizable from a mere 22 weeks ago. He feels energetic, and in control of his health.
Meet SanDera, a mother of 5 in her 30's who works for a diabetes out-patient clinic.Forks over Knives Trailer (click here if you don't see the video)
For more information on this upcoming documentary go the Forks Over Knives website
Keep an eye out for Forks Over Knives opening this summer. It's sure to stir up some controversy.
"The greatest gift that you could possibly give to your family--you can make them aware of this incredible power to avoid life's most painful events. You just don't have to have those kinds of events."
-Dr. Caldwell B. Esselstyn-
Posted on May 14, 2010 at 11:54 AM | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
|
One man’s struggle to reverse his severe heart disease .... with diet.
Charles, 45, devoted husband and father of two, is shocked to learn not only that he has cardiovascular disease but that the blockages in his heart are so severe that his surgeon refuses to operate. But Charles is a fighter and he’ll do whatever it takes to be around to see his kids grow up.
Just like Charles, millions of Americans are sick and they’re tired of the pills and operations. What if you could avoid it all, but nobody’s willing to tell you how?
Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn of the Cleveland Clinic is trampling the status quo to get the word out. He’s the director of one of the longest-running studies in the peer-reviewed scientific literature showing that a plant-based diet can reverse even late stage heart disease. If heart disease, the number one killer in America, can be stopped and often reversed with diet, why aren't people like Charles routinely given this information before being sent to the operating room?
-Synopsis of "Chow Down: Eat Like Your Life Depends On It?-
If you received this via email click here to go to the web version with all the links.
Last Monday Ann Esselstyn lent me a copy of Chow Down: Eat Like Your Life Depends On It--a Julia Grayer/Gage Johnston documentary that was 4 years in the making! Click here for the film's website.
I finally had a chance to watch it with my husband last night, and...
Our verdict? We both loved it! Nothing dull or dry about this documentary. It's lighthearted, clever, controversial, with cool animation to help explain the technical stuff--and it tells the truth. So go out & find yourself a copy!
Bottom Line: Over 130 million Americans have a chronic illness--and 70% of deaths are caused by those chronic illnesses. Type 2 Diabetes and heart disease can be prevented or reversed--and 60% of all cancers can be prevented--just by putting to use the knowledge we already have. The answer isn't in pills and procedures--it's in eating a well-planned plant-based diet. But it takes time, preparation, a shift in your food taste preferences, and above all--motivation and support from family, friends, and a healthcare professional. And that's certainly been true for me.
How Did We Get Into This Mess? Why Isn't This Information Front Page News?Just follow the money. The food and drug industries are not looking out for our health. And our government & medical "industries" have their own vested interests in the status quo. There's profit in cheap sweet fatty salty unhealthy food. There's profit in pharmaceuticals and medical procedures. And who knew the U.S. Department of Agriculture was more of a lobbying agency for farmers than a guardian of our health. They're the folks who advise us about what to eat with their Food Pyramid--and provide food for school lunches. It's like the fox guarding the hen house.
The meat & dairy industries--the big players--get 74% of our agricultural subsidies. Less than 1/2 of 1 percent goes to fruit & vegetable farmers. Hmm.
According to Dr. Neal Barnard, the generic ads we see for beef and milk are funded from government programs. The federal government at one time even worked with Wendy's to help create the Cheddar Lover's Beef Burger to sell more cheese--and the same with Subway.
Can You Really Change Your Health By Changing Your Diet? Yes, You Can.
Charles Venezia: a young father, who was a meat-lover, a vegetable-hater, a hypertensive since age 16, with multiple coronary blockages so severe his surgeon refused to operate. His choices: disability, death, or a diet change. He chose a diet change--with support from Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn.
Before:
Blood Pressure: 250/155
Weight: 360 lbs.
Cholesterol: 220
After:
Blood Pressure: 120/80
Weight: not mentioned but he looks fantastic--and healthy!
Cholesterol: 140
He's had no coronary events and he leads a full active life.
Charles is 100% committed to eating plant-based, and he's fortunate to have a highly motivated wife who is willing to spend the time it takes to shop and prepare plant-based fare. But it wasn't easy for Charles, the son of a butcher. For him this change was a complete paradigm shift--he still misses his meat and he misses restaurant eating, "It's not fun. It doesn't taste all that great. But I'm not going to have a heart attack." He also follows up regularly with Dr. Esselstyn. Even Charles' young children are following the program--eating 75-80% healthy plant-based fare.
My comment to Charles: Come on over to my house & eat. Our meals are 100% tastier & more interesting than anything I used to make that involved beef or chicken!
Charles and John Oehrle are just two of hundreds of patients seen by Dr. Esselstyn who have stopped or reversed their heart disease, arrested their diabetes, returned to normal weight, lowered their blood pressure, and regained their health by switching to a plant-based (no meat or dairy) diet of:
Cardiac Procedures & Statins Don't Cure Disease
Esselstyn is fond of saying:
"The Elelphant in the room is that procedures really don't prolong life. Stents, bypasses, dialysis--none of it works."
John Oehrle's Philadelphia surgeon told him: Procedures are just a temporary patch job. These procedures do nothing to cure the diseases. When we do these operations we put a band-aid on these people. It doesn't treat the disease. They have to do that for themselves.
Taking statins and not changing your diet does not "cure cardiovascular disease"--and almost 1/2 of men who have a heart attack before age 65 are dead within 8 years.
Think this doesn't apply to you because you don't have diagnosed heart disease? Big coronary blockages only cause 12% of the heart attacks. Most of the time it's the little arterial plaques that cause 88% of blockages--3 small blockages are a ticking time bomb--and you won't even know it! Your coronary artery has to be 70% occluded to have symptoms, like angina. If your arteries are even 10-69% blocked, and you're inflaming them with what you eat, you're at risk. It's all about inflammation - Calm down the inflammation & you'll keep those atherosclerotic plaques safely stuck to your artery walls.
Bottom Line: Operations don't cure everything. You have to do that yourself with serious diet & lifestyle changes.
Dr. Hans Diehl on the Benefits of Diet: "As we treat heart disease with diet we also help to prevent strokes, fragility, dementia, blood pressure, and the common cancers like breast and prostate. It's probably one common disease that expresses itself in different ways."
What Keeps Us From Making Drastic Diet & Lifestyle Changes?Click here for a great animated video explaining how a heart attack happens--or if you don't see the Chow Down trailer on your screen.
To read more about Dr. Esselstyn, and a heart-healthy diet:
Yes, You Can Prevent & Reverse Heart Disease - But Are You Up for the Challenge? Let Dr. Esselstyn Convince You!
Some Q & A From The Esselstyn Father & Son Team: The Plant Strong Fireman & The Plant Perfect Doctor
Posted on May 03, 2010 at 09:24 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
|
|
|

